Building the shortlist: from forty universities to eight
A long list is easy and useless. The work is in the cuts, and there is a right order to make them in.

Cut on the hard constraints first: they are objective, they do not require taste, and each one removes a lot of names at once. Soft preferences come last, when only a handful of candidates remain.
The order of cuts
- 1Money. Remove anything the family cannot fund and that offers no aid you could realistically win. This usually halves the list in one pass.
- 2Subject requirements. Remove anything that demands a Higher Level subject or test you do not have and cannot get in time.
- 3Grades. Compare your predictions with the published typical offer. Below it by more than two points, keep one as a reach at most.
- 4Course content. Read the year-one module list for each survivor. This cut is the most informative and the one most people skip.
- 5Place. Only now consider city versus campus, climate, distance and how often you could fly home.
What the final list should look like
Six to nine universities, spread across reaches, matches and safeties, all affordable under some realistic scenario and all somewhere you would actually go. If a name on the list makes you feel nothing, it is doing no work and costs you an essay.
What to remember
- Cut on money, requirements and grades before taste.
- Read the year-one modules — the cut most people skip.
- Six to nine names is a working list; forty is a fantasy.
- Record why each rejected university was cut.
Read next
Applying9 min readUCAS and the Common App: two systems that want opposite things from you
One asks a single academic question and wants one answer. The other asks who you are and wants many. Confusing them is the most common reason a strong student gets thin results.
Read →
Applying8 min readWriting a personal statement that does not sound like everyone else's
Admissions tutors read thousands of these. Most open with a childhood memory and a quotation. The ones that work open with evidence.
Read →